"The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era." PloS one 10.6: (2015).ĭoi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502. Larivière, Vincent, Stefanie Haustein, and Philippe Mongeon. The value added, however, has not followed a similar trend.” “The proportion of the scientific output published in journals under their ownership has risen steadily over the past 40 years, and even more so since the advent of the digital era. College & Research Libraries, 79(6): 2018.
Is it such a big deal? On the cost of journal use in the digital era. We find that university researchers cite only a fraction of journals purchased by their libraries, that this fraction is decreasing, and that the cost per cited journal has increased.”
“hile big deal bundles do decrease the mean price per subscribed journal, academic libraries receive less value for their investment. The librarians’ dilemma: Contemplating the costs of the “Big Deal.” D-Lib Magazine, 7(3): 2001. Those who follow us will face the all-or-nothing choice of paying whatever publishers want or giving up an indispensable resource.”įrazier, K. In the longer run, these contracts will weaken the power of librarians and consumers to influence scholarly communication systems in the future. “There's no question that the Big Deal offers desirable short-term benefits, including expanded information access for the library's licensed users.
the content is, henceforth, "bundled" so that individual journal subscriptions can no longer be cancelled in their electronic format. Under the terms of the contract, annual price increases are capped for a number of years.
#Publisher plus plus#
In the Big Deal, libraries agree to buy electronic access to all of a commercial publisher's journals for a price based on current payments to that publisher, plus some increment. “he Big Deal is an online aggregation of journals that publishers offer as a one-price, one size fits all package.
0 kommentar(er)
